Less Than Impressed With New Obama Education Proposal
If you were watching the president’s State of The Union Address last night, you may have caught the part where he said that college loans should only have to be paid back for twenty years and only 10 years if you choose public service. He insinuated that the government would pick up the tab for the balance of the loan at that point in time.
His reasoning was that no person should go broke because they want a higher education. Is this guy for real? I have rarely heard anything more ridiculous in my entire life. Talk about socialism.
The reason some people aren’t attending college is not because of the costs. They are not attending college because they don’t realize that it is critical to their future success. They don’t realize how much easier life will be if they could only put for the effort to get an education. If a person wants to go to a certain college that they can’t afford, it does not prevent them from going to college at all. It merely prevents them from going to that college. Ultimately, they decide to go to a less expensive one even if that means a community college.
Face it. These kids who choose not do go to college at all just don’t want to learn. They don’t want to go to college. If they did want to go, they could certainly afford it. Any kid can afford to go to a school like ECC or GCC or MCC. There is absolutely no reason they can’t. These colleges will accept anyone with a GED. All you have to do is graduate high school and you are in.
The problem is that these kids who skip college are not interested in learning. They don’t have a thirst for the knowledge and skills that these higher learning institutions offer. If they did want to go badly, there is nothing stopping them, including costs.
I am so sick of this argument about college costs. Stop subsidizing the expensive schools. Let the market decide how much a student is willing to pay for their higher education. The whole idea of subsidizing college tuitions is counterproductive to maintaining a low cost of education. This is basic economics people. If the government quits paying for people’s college educations, the colleges are forced to find ways to deliver that education for less money. This is how it is supposed to work.
The goal should not be to give people enough money to go to college. The goal should be to let the market force colleges to make themselves affordable to students. When the economy is booming tuitions could go up. When the economy is suffering tuitions would go down.
Part of the reason our educations cost so much is because schools get funding from places other than the enrolled students. This creates the perfect environment for a wasteful bloated bureaucracy. Let the markets determine school tuitions.
If the government agrees to pick up the tab for educations at the end of 10 or 20 years, you are going to see an absolutely massive increase in tuition costs. Pumping more money into colleges does not guarantee a better education. We have proof of this in the public school system that has had funding increases since the beginning of time. It is counterproductive.
Prestigious universities and community colleges alike are capable of delivering an absolutely outstanding education if and only if the students are there because they actually want to learn about what is being taught. If they aren’t self motivated to learn what is being taught, then they come out of there with a substandard education.
If you want to reduce the cost of education, stop sending kids there who don’t want to be there. Stop handing colleges free money. The more you give them, the more they will cry that they need even more.
The populist attitude around this country is that every kid should receive a free higher education and the government should see to it that they get one. How about focusing on getting them to graduate high school first you fricken morons? A college education is easily and readily attainable to any kid who wants it right now.
