<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Buffalo Dave &#187; 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buffalodave.com/tag/2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buffalodave.com</link>
	<description>A Buffalo blogger with some issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:24:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nothing More Exciting Than Watching Womens Olympic Curling</title>
		<link>http://buffalodave.com/nothing-more-exciting-than-watching-womens-olympic-curling/</link>
		<comments>http://buffalodave.com/nothing-more-exciting-than-watching-womens-olympic-curling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalodave.com/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I turned on the television during supper last night and managed to catch part of the women’s curling competition.  Being from the northern United States I actually know what this sport is.  I wonder how many kids tuning into the Olympics for the first time are going “Huh?  What the heck is curling?  Where are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="USA Womens Curling Team" src="http://images.publicradio.org/content/2006/02/09/20060209_cassiejohnson_2.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" />I turned on the television during supper last night and managed to catch part of the women’s curling competition.  Being from the northern United States I actually know what this sport is.  I wonder how many kids tuning into the Olympics for the first time are going “Huh?  What the heck is curling?  Where are the dumbbells?”</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Yep.  There is nothing quite like the seat of the couch action you get when watching an event like this.  It is like watching a giant shuffleboard tournament.  (I bet a lot of people don’t know what shuffleboard is either)  The girl gets on one knee and slides a giant rock down a slippery lane trying to strategically position it for points.  All the while she is yelling things like “Yep,  yep, yes, yes, yes, yep, hold, hooooooold, yep, yes, yes”  Meanwhile two other girls are alternate between furiously sweeping miniscule debris away in front of the rock as it heads toward its target.  Sometimes they sweep like madmen and other times they just fake like they are going to do it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>What a concept is sports.  Who invented this thing anyway?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>My wife was watching it with me.  The United States was competing against the Janpanese.  When the Japanese girl went to launch her rock I wondered if she would start yelling “Hai, hai, hai, hai” instead of yes.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The other thing I found very strange was the names of the women on the Japanese team.  They had Americanized first names like Amy and Moe.  Seems like some Europeans have been doing some breeding in that part of Japan.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I felt inspired to throw my own two cents in about the Olympics when I read about <a title="olympics" href="http://paulbuckley14059.wordpress.com/2010/02/14/viewing-the-winter-olympics-in-30-second-glimpses/" target="_blank">Paul Buckley’s post about the Olympics</a>.</p>
<p>I kind of like the extra coverage of Lindsey Vonn.  I guess I am just a pig with raging hormones who likes to see hot looking women on television.</p>
<p>I agree about the rain though.  How disappointing is it to have a rainy winter Olympics?  The rain has already influenced a number of outcomes.  It is a shame that weather plays a factor in some of these competitions like the biathlon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buffalodave.com/nothing-more-exciting-than-watching-womens-olympic-curling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Less Than Impressed With New Obama Education Proposal</title>
		<link>http://buffalodave.com/less-than-impressed-with-new-obama-education-proposal/</link>
		<comments>http://buffalodave.com/less-than-impressed-with-new-obama-education-proposal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buffalodave.com/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you were watching the president’s State of The Union Address last night, you may have caught the part where he said that college loans should only have to be paid back for twenty years and only 10 years if you choose public service.  He insinuated that the government would pick up the tab for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you were watching the president’s State of The Union Address last night, you may have caught the part where he said that college loans should only have to be paid back for twenty years and only 10 years if you choose public service.  He insinuated that the government would pick up the tab for the balance of the loan at that point in time.</p>
<p>His reasoning was that no person should go broke because they want a higher education.  Is this guy for real?  I have rarely heard anything more ridiculous in my entire life.  Talk about socialism.</p>
<p>The reason some people aren’t attending college is not because of the costs.  They are not attending college because they don’t realize that it is critical to their future success.  They don’t realize how much easier life will be if they could only put for the effort to get an education.  If a person wants to go to a certain college that they can’t afford, it does not prevent them from going to college at all.  It merely prevents them from going to that college.  Ultimately, they decide to go to a less expensive one even if that means a community college. </p>
<p>Face it.  These kids who choose not do go to college at all just don’t want to learn.  They don’t want to go to college.  If they did want to go, they could certainly afford it.  Any kid can afford to go to a school like ECC or GCC or MCC.  There is absolutely no reason they can’t.  These colleges will accept anyone with a GED.  All you have to do is graduate high school and you are in.</p>
<p>The problem is that these kids who skip college are not interested in learning.  They don’t have a thirst for the knowledge and skills that these higher learning institutions offer.  If they did want to go badly, there is nothing stopping them, including costs.</p>
<p>I am so sick of this argument about college costs.  Stop subsidizing the expensive schools.  Let the market decide how much a student is willing to pay for their higher education.  The whole idea of subsidizing college tuitions is counterproductive to maintaining a low cost of education.  This is basic economics people.  If the government quits paying for people’s college educations, the colleges are forced to find ways to deliver that education for less money.  This is how it is supposed to work.</p>
<p>The goal should not be to give people enough money to go to college.  The goal should be to let the market force colleges to make themselves affordable to students.  When the economy is booming tuitions could go up.  When the economy is suffering tuitions would go down.</p>
<p>Part of the reason our educations cost so much is because schools get funding from places other than the enrolled students.  This creates the perfect environment for a wasteful bloated bureaucracy.  Let the markets determine school tuitions.</p>
<p>If the government agrees to pick up the tab for educations at the end of 10 or 20 years, you are going to see an absolutely massive increase in tuition costs.  Pumping more money into colleges does not guarantee a better education.  We have proof of this in the public school system that has had funding increases since the beginning of time.  It is counterproductive.</p>
<p>Prestigious universities and community colleges alike are capable of delivering an absolutely outstanding education if and only if the students are there because they actually want to learn about what is being taught.  If they aren’t self motivated to learn what is being taught, then they come out of there with a substandard education.   </p>
<p>If you want to reduce the cost of education, stop sending kids there who don’t want to be there.  Stop handing colleges free money.  The more you give them, the more they will cry that they need even more.</p>
<p>The populist attitude around this country is that every kid should receive a free higher education and the government should see to it that they get one.  How about focusing on getting them to graduate high school first you fricken morons?  A college education is easily and readily attainable to any kid who wants it right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buffalodave.com/less-than-impressed-with-new-obama-education-proposal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

